2022 Volume 10 Issue 3
Creative Commons License

KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION OF IN-OFFICE AND HOME TEETH BLEACHING AND RELATED ADVERSE EFFECTS IN SAUDI ARABIA

Sultan S Al-Shamrani1*, Abdulaziz Mohammed Alobaida2, Faisal Mohammed Alzain2, Yazan Abdulaziz Alasiri2, Mohammed Abdullah Alothman2, Osamah Ibrahim Bin Hussain2

1Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [email protected]

2General Dental Practitioner Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.


ABSTRACT

Teeth bleaching is more popular in Saudi Arabia. The purpose of the present study was to assess the knowledge of at-home and In-office teeth bleaching and its adverse effects among the general population of Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional study used a structured, close-ended, self-administered and pretested online questionnaire to record the responses. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were applied to the data. Results showed that the participants in this study were 2065 people. The number of male and female respondents was 45.6% and 54.4%, respectively. Tea, coffee, smoking/tobacco, and shisha were mentioned by 88.2% of the study participants as all causes of teeth staining. 99.3% of the study participants had prior knowledge of teeth bleaching. Nearly 61.5% and 62.2% of study participants were aware of the adverse effects of home-based and dentist-supervised bleaching products. The knowledge of teeth bleaching and its adverse effects differed significantly across this study's demographic factors. This study showed adequate knowledge of teeth discoloration, bleaching protocols, and adverse effects. However, most study participants favored in-office bleaching rather than at-home bleaching.

Key words: Teeth whitening, In-office bleaching, At-home bleaching, Knowledge, Adverse effects.


Introduction

A dull smile has social repercussions. Demand for improved and beautiful smiles has become integral to dental procedures [1]. Many people, especially young females, are concerned about their smiles because the first thing people notice when meeting a new person is their smile [2]. In the present era, patients increasingly demand a perfect smile due to a shift in priorities and the impact of the media [3, 4].

 

Since teeth color is interrelated to each individual's aesthetics, teeth discoloration is frequently reported among patients seeking aesthetic treatment [5]. The practice of whitening the teeth is known as bleaching. Through bleaching, oxidation occurs within the enamel, making it look lighter than before [6]. Bleaching is a minimally invasive process used to treat discolored teeth [7].

 

The popularity of teeth whitening has climbed many-fold with the availability of over-the-counter bleaching agents. Recent advances in aesthetic dentistry have led to a wide selection of teeth whitening products. These include toothpaste, dentifrices, and gels. In addition, lifestyle habits like smoking, and consumption of black tea and coffee, may lead to darker-colored teeth [8]. Generally, bleaching products are classified into two categories, i.e., home and in-office bleaching products. Besides hydrogen peroxide, which is widely used as a bleaching agent, chlorides, peroxides, and chlorine are sometimes also used. Along with the active agent, inactive constituents such as glycerine to maintain moisture, gelling to enhance the viscosity, preservatives such as methyl or sodium benzoate to prevent bacterial growth, and flavoring agents to improve taste are also used in the product [9].

 

A past survey revealed that 25.6% of the dental patients used saline, and 10% used lemon as a home-based dental whitening agent [10]. Another study showed that the patients were inclined to choose advertised and home bleaching products compared to professional bleaching [1]. In addition, a survey of the association between age, sex, level of education, marital status, and type of work on the perception and knowledge of patients regarding teeth whitening products has been reported previously [5].

 

Despite the benefits of teeth bleaching, there are evident side effects such as increased teeth sensitivity [11], irritation of gingivae and mucous membrane [12], weakening of the dentin and enamel damage [13], and demineralization of the teeth surface [1] and most of Saudi Arabia's population is unaware of the adverse effects of teeth bleaching. Therefore, this cross-sectional study aims to assess the knowledge of at-home and In-office teeth bleaching and their adverse effects amongst the general population in Saudi Arabia.

 

Materials and Methods

 

This analytical cross-sectional survey-based study was designed and targeted across Saudi Arabia to measure the population's knowledge of at-home and in-office teeth bleaching. A non-probability convenience sampling method was adopted to collect the data from individuals aged ≥18 and collected from March 2021 to May 2021. Participation in this survey was voluntary. Informed consent was taken from the participants, and the purpose of this study was explained before participants' enrollment. The confidentiality of the participants was assured throughout the study without collecting personal identifier information.

An online structured questionnaire was developed using Google forms. The authors of this study shared the survey link using e-mails, WhatsApp, and other social media applications with their contacts. The online questionnaire made it impossible to submit the form without filling in the entire field. Therefore, the participants were encouraged to roll out the survey further to achieve maximal participation. Ethical approval (FUGRP/2021/219/386/384) for the study was obtained from the Research and Innovation Center of Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

 

This cross-sectional study with a snowball sampling method was conducted in all of Saudi Arabia. A modified close-ended questionnaire in Arabic/English was available for the participants. No personal data except gender, age, and level of education would be collected from the participants.

 

A modified questionnaire based on previous research conducted by Alshamrani and Wahid was used to meet the current research requirements [2]. The questionnaire comprised of three parts:

Part 1: Four questions related to socio-demographics (Age, gender, educational level and  area)

Part 2: Five questions on causes of teeth discoloration and sources of information

Part 3: Seven items on knowledge about teeth bleaching, including at-home and in-office teeth bleaching methods.

Part 4: Six items on knowledge of adverse effects of teeth bleaching.

 

Pilot testing of the questionnaire demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach's alfa=0.91) and face validity.

 

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics of frequency distribution and percentages were calculated for all the categorical variables. The chi-square test assessed the relationship between categorical variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical purposes. Statistical analysis package IBM-SPSS version 25 (Armonk, NY: USA) was used for the data analysis.

 

Results and Discussion

 

A total of 2065 participated in this study. The number of male and female respondents was 45.6% and 54.4%, respectively. Nearly 64.3% of the study participants were aged between 20-30 years, and 44.7% of participants had a postgraduate level of education. Moreover, 47.9% of the subjects belonged to the central region of Saudi Arabia (Table 1).

 

 

Table 1. Demographic variables of the study participants (n=2065)

 

Variables

n

%

Age (in years)

20-30

1327

64.3

31-40

261

12.6

41-50

257

12.4

>51

220

10.7

Gender

Female

1124

54.4

Male

941

45.6

Education

School

887

43

Degree/Diploma

254

12.3

Post-graduation

924

44.7

Area

Eastern

445

21.5

Central

989

47.9

Northern

121

5.9

Southern

297

14.4

Western

213

10.3

 

 

Knowledge of Causes of teeth discoloration

 

 

Table 2. Knowledge of teeth-discoloration causes among study participants

Variables

n

%

Drinks and Smoke

Tea

36

1.7%

Coffee

60

2.9%

Smoking/tobacco

95

4.6%

Shisha

11

0.5%

All of the above

1821

88.2%

Don't know

42

2.0%

Antibiotics such as tetracycline and doxycycline

Yes

573

27.7%

No

3

0.1%

I don't know

1489

72.1%

Aging

True

1231

59.6%

False

263

12.7%

I don't know

571

27.7%

Intrinsic and extrinsic causes

True

1063

51.5%

False

293

14.2%

I don't know

709

34.3%

 

 

When asked about the causes of teeth staining, 88.2% of the study participants mentioned tea, coffee, smoking/tobacco, and shisha as all causes of teeth staining. In addition, nearly 27.7% and 59.6% of subjects agreed that antibiotics (tetracycline and doxycycline) and aging causes teeth staining. Moreover, more than half, 51.5%, of the participants attributed teeth staining to intrinsic and extrinsic causes (Table 1).

Knowledge and source of information on teeth-bleaching among study participants

Almost 99.3% of the study participants were knowledgeable about teeth bleaching. The primary source of information for the study participants was advertisements (34%), followed by dentists (33.3%) and family friends (Figure 1).

 

 

Figure 1. Source of information on teeth bleaching (N=2065)

 

 

Almost half  (48.9%) of the respondents were aware of products (Toothpaste, White strips, and gels) used at home for teeth whitening. In addition, 89.1% of the study participants agree that dentist-supervised bleaching is more effective than home bleaching, and 41.5% knew that the beaching of teeth under dentist supervision is usually a one-day process. Moreover, 67.2% of subjects knew that dentist-supervised bleaching concentrated bleaching agents are used compared to home-based bleaching products (Table 3).

 

 

Table 3. Knowledge of teeth bleaching among study participants (N=2065)

 

Variables

n

%

Do you know about teeth bleaching?

Yes

2051

99.3%

No

14

0.7%

How did you know about teeth bleaching?

Advertisement

703

34.0%

Dentist

687

33.3%

Family/friend

502

24.3%

Not applicable

173

8.4%

Is teeth whitening/bleaching possible at home?

 

Yes

1731

83.8%

No

5

0.2%

I don't know

329

15.9%

What products can be used at home for teeth whitening?

 

Toothpaste

413

20.0%

White strips

322

15.6%

Gels

74

3.6%

All of the above

1010

48.9%

Don't know

246

11.9%

Is dentist-supervised bleaching more effective than home bleaching?

Yes

1840

89.1%

No

14

0.7%

I don't know

211

10.2%

Bleaching of teeth under dentist supervision is usually a one-day process.

True

857

41.5%

False

610

29.5%

I don't know

598

29.0%

In dentist-supervised bleaching, concentrated bleaching agents are used compared to home-based bleaching products

True

1387

67.2%

False

151

7.3%

I don't know

527

25.5%

 

Nearly 61.5% of the study participants mentioned that they know the adverse effects of home-based whitening/bleaching products. However, when asked about the adverse effects of the dentist's supervised whitening/bleaching products, 62.2% responded positively. In addition, study participants were knowledgeable about the temporary teeth-whitening of bleaching products (83.8%), teeth sensitivity (81.2%), wearing of enamel surface (60.7%), and gum and mucus membrane irritation (64.6%), following the bleaching treatment (Table 4).

 

 

Table 4. Knowledge of adverse effects of teeth bleaching

Variables

n

%

Are there any adverse effects of home-based whitening/bleaching products?

Yes

1270

61.5%

No

18

0.9%

I dont know

777

37.6%

Are there any adverse effects of the dentist's supervised whitening/bleaching products?

Yes

1284

62.2%

No

14

0.7%

I don't know

767

37.1%

Do you know that the whitening of teeth using bleaching products is temporary?

Yes

1730

83.8%

No

19

0.9%

I don't know

316

15.3%

Do you know that teeth sensitivity usually follows after bleaching?

Yes

1676

81.2%

No

10

0.5%

I don't know

379

18.4%

Do you know that wearing of enamel surface occurs due to bleaching?

Yes

1253

60.7%

No

26

1.3%

I don't know

786

38.1%

Do you know that gums and mucus membrane irritants can also happen due to bleaching?

Yes

1335

64.6%

No

14

0.7%

I don't know

716

34.7%

 

 

Table 5. Knowledge of teeth bleaching and adverse effects across different demographic variables

 

Variables

Age

Gender

Education

20-30

31-40

41-50

>51

p

Female

Male

p

School

Degree/

Diploma

PG

p

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Knowledge of bleaching

Yes

99.2

99.2

99.6

99.5

0.891

99.2

99.5

0.458

99.5

97.6

99.6

0.002

No

0.8

0.8

0.4

0.5

0.8

0.5

0.5

2.4

0.4

Home bleaching

Yes

61.3

66.7

60.7

57.3

0.439

65.7

56.5

<0.001

59.8

56.7

64.5

<0.001

No

0.9

0.8

0.4

1.4

0.7

1.1

0.3

3.9

0.5

IDK

37.8

32.6

38.9

41.4

33.6

42.4

39.9

39.4

35.0

Dentist supervised

bleaching

Yes

63.5

58.6

58.0

63.2

0.138

63.6

60.5

0.263

62.5

58.7

62.9

0.301

No

0.5

0.8

0.8

1.8

0.5

0.9

0.5

1.6

0.6

IDK

36.0

40.6

41.2

35.0

35.9

38.7

37.1

39.8

36.5

Teeth whitening temporary

Yes

84.3

85.8

80.2

82.7

0.119

85.0

82.4

0.222

83.9

84.6

83.4

0.001

No

1.1

0.4

0.0

1.8

1.0

0.9

0.7

3.1

0.5

IDK

14.7

13.8

19.8

15.5

14.1

16.8

15.4

12.2

16.0

Teeth sensitivity

Yes

81.1

85.8

77.8

80.0

0.012

85.4

76.1

<0.001

79.5

82.3

82.5

0.031

No

0.5

0.0

0.0

1.8

0.5

0.4

0.3

1.6

0.3

IDK

18.5

14.2

22.2

18.2

14.1

23.5

20.2

16.1

17.2

Teeth wearing away

Yes

59.2

60.9

63.8

65.5

0.086

63.1

57.8

0.045

60.0

60.2

61.5

<0.001

No

1.0

2.7

0.8

1.8

1.1

1.5

0.5

3.9

1.3

IDK

39.8

36.4

35.4

32.7

35.9

40.7

39.6

35.8

37.2

Gum and mucosal

irritation

Yes

66.3

60.9

61.1

63.2

0.178

68.2

60.4

0.001

66.6

61.0

63.7

0.005

No

0.6

1.5

0.8

0.0

0.7

0.6

0.3

2.4

0.5

IDK

33.1

37.5

38.1

36.8

31.0

39.0

33.0

36.6

35.7

IDK=I Don't Know, PG=Postgraduation

 

 

The knowledge of bleaching and its adverse effects are compared across different demographic variables, as shown in Table 5. Statistically significant differences were observed in teeth sensitivity across the different age groups of the study participants (p=0.012). Similarly, statistically significant gender differences were observed in home bleaching (p<0.001), teeth sensitivity (p<0.001), wearing of teeth (p=0.045) and gum and mucosal irritation (p=0.001) after teeth bleaching. In addition, knowledge of bleaching (p=0.002), adverse effects of home bleaching (p=<0.001), teeth whitening is temporary (p=0.001), teeth sensitivity (p=0.031), wearing of the teeth (p <0.001) and gum and mucosal irritation (p=0.005).

 

People must be informed of the various kinds of bleaching procedures and products to make the best judgments about their treatments by considering the reason for teeth discoloration. Therefore, this study assessed knowledge and perception of the In-office and home teeth bleaching among study participants. The findings of this study showed that many participants knew about drinking (Tea and coffee) and smoking as the leading causes of teeth staining. However, Nomay et al. (2015) [14] reported that less than 20% of the study participants agreed to avoid tea, coffee, and smoking after bleaching. Moreover, over half of the participants attributed the causes of teeth staining to aging and intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, the study participant's knowledge regarding the antibiotics such as tetracycline and doxycycline as the cause of teeth staining was poor. This study's finding aligns with Almassi et al.'s [15] report about the causes of teeth staining.

 

In this study, more than 99% of the study participants were aware of teeth bleaching. This result is similar to the study published by Nomay et al. (2015) [14], in which 18.3%, 40.2%, 28.7%, and 12.8% demonstrated excellent, good, fair, and poor knowledge of teeth bleaching. However, this knowledge of teeth bleaching varied significantly across different educational categories, with postgraduate participants demonstrating the highest awareness.

 

 Previous studies in Saudi Arabia have indicated that the advertisements followed by friends, relatives, and dentists were the source of information about teeth bleaching [1, 15]. Our study finding is in line with previous studies in which advertisement is the primary source of information on teeth bleaching, followed by dentists, family, and friends.

 

When inquired about the possibility of teeth whitening/bleaching at home, 83.8% of the participants responded positively. Almost half of the participants used toothpaste, white strips, and gels as part of home bleaching. However, the use of home teeth whitening/bleaching differed significantly, with a substantially higher percentage of females than males preferring home teeth whitening/bleaching. Similarly, a higher rate of subjects with postgraduate education preferred home bleaching than other education categories. Contrarily, many respondents believed that dentist-supervised bleaching is more effective than home bleaching, and the bleaching of teeth under dentists' supervision is usually a one-day process. This finding suggests that most respondents preferred in-office teeth bleaching under the dentist's supervision [16, 17]. This finding could be supported by the fact that home bleaching requires full patient compliance and has a relatively low success rate [16]. Also, most of the study participants knew about using higher concentrations of the bleaching agent in dentist-supervised bleaching than in-home bleaching. Furthermore, when dentist-supervised bleaching was compared across different ages, gender, and educational levels of the study participants, no significant differences were observed.  

 

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is the active agent frequently used in most teeth‑bleaching products of in-office techniques [18, 19]. Hence hydrogen peroxide tends to cause undesirable adverse effects in the oral cavity, such as teeth sensitivity, irritation of the oral mucosa, and wearing away of the enamel surface [20]. Our findings showed that most respondents were more knowledgeable about the adverse effects of in-office teeth bleaching than at-home bleaching products. In addition, a very high percentage of the study participants agreed that the whitening of teeth using bleaching products is temporary, and teeth sensitivity usually accompanies teeth bleaching. People must be aware of these side effects to prepare themselves, reducing the number of complaints about dental treatments. In-office bleaching is always the preferred method because it minimizes side effects and allows the patient to see immediate results [9]. Most of the study participants in our study knew teeth sensitivity was common after teeth bleaching. Contrarily, lower participants were knowledgeable that it could cause gingival irritation and wearing of the enamel if used incorrectly. This finding is in line with the study reported by Jaha and colleagues [17].

 

Adverse effects of bleaching showed significant variation across different demographic factors. Responses of the study participants on the non-permanent nature of teeth whitening differed significantly across educational categories. While responses to teeth sensitivity after bleaching differed across various age groups, gender and educational levels. Contrarily, teeth wearing and gum and mucosal irritation after teeth bleaching showed a statistically significant difference across different gender and educational level. This finding can corroborate the results reported by Al-Nomay and colleagues 14, which were in females, participants with a university degree and respondents aged < 30 tended to have increased knowledge of teeth bleaching.

 

Strength and limitations of the study

The larger sample size, high response rate and use of a reliable and valid questionnaire are the strength of this study. However, the use of cross-sectional design is a major limitation of the study. Further clinical studies on teeth bleaching and its adverse effects among patients are needed to confirm th current study findings.

Conclusion

 

This study showed adequate knowledge of teeth discoloration, bleaching protocols and adverse effects. However, most study participants favored in-office bleaching rather than at-home bleaching. Study participants cited the media as the primary source of information about dental bleaching. Moreover, knowledge of teeth bleaching and its adverse effects were influenced by participants' age, gender and educational levels.

 

Acknowledgments: We are thankful to the Research and Innovation Centre of Riyadh Elm University for supporting this project.

Conflict of interest: None

Financial support: None

Ethics statement: This study was approved by the Research and Innovation Centre of Riyadh Elm University (FUGRP/2021/219/386/384).

References

1.       AlOtaibi G, AlMutairi MS, AlShammari MZ, AlJafar M, AlMaraikhi TF. Prevalence and public knowledge regarding tooth bleaching in Saudi Arabia. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9(7):3729-32.

2.       Alshamrani AMT, Wahid AQA. General Public Perceptions and Knowledge on Tooth Bleaching in Riyadh, KSA. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;71(3):2727-37. Available from: https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_8687.html

3.       Pretty IA, Brunton P, Aminian A, Davies RM, Ellwood RP. Vital tooth bleaching in dental practice: 3. Biological, dental and legal issues. Dent Update. 2006;33(7):422-32.

4.       Hatherell S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Ericson D, Gilmour ASM. Attitudes of final-year dental students to bleaching of vital and non-vital teeth in Cardiff, Cork, and Malmö. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):263-9.

5.       Widodo PN, Soetjipta NL, Palupi R. Perception and knowledge of patients towards teeth whitening treatment. Eur Asian J Biosci. 2020;14(2):3759-64.

6.       Joiner A. The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2006;34(7):412-9.

7.       Matis BA, Cochran MA, Franco M, Al-Ammar W, Eckert GJ, Stropes M. Eight in-office tooth whitening systems evaluated in vivo: a pilot study. Oper Dent. 2007;32(4):322-7.

8.       Silva EM da, Maia JN da SMD, Mitraud CG, Russo J do ES, Poskus LT, Guimarães JGA. Can whitening toothpastes maintain the optical stability of enamel over time? J Appl Oral Sci Rev FOB. 2018;26:e20160460.

9.       Alqahtani MQ. Tooth-bleaching procedures and their controversial effects: A literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(2):33-46.

10.    Almas K, Albaker A, Felembam N. Knowledge of dental health and diseases among dental patients, a multicentre study in Saudi Arabia. Indian J Dent Res Off Publ Indian Soc Dent Res. 2000;11(4):145-55.

11.    Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and staining: a review of the literature. Br Dent J. 2001;190(6):309-16.

12.    Li Y. Biological properties of peroxide-containing tooth whiteners. Food Chem Toxicol Int J Publ Br Ind Biol Res Assoc. 1996;34(9):887-904.

13.    Haywood VB, Leech T, Heymann HO, Crumpler D, Bruggers K. Nightguard vital bleaching: effects on enamel surface texture and diffusion. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 1985. 1990;21(10):801-4.

14.    Al-Nomay N, Ahmed A, Alhargan A, Ashi ِA, Alshalhoub A. Public Knowledge of Tooth Bleaching in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Int Oral Health. 2015;77:27-32.

15.    Alamassi B, Alahmari H, Alhabashy M, Talha A, Alfehaid W, Alhuwaymil A. Awareness and Knowledge of the Adult Population in Saudi Arabia on Teeth Discoloration and Treatment Options: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;603-13.

16.    Leonard RH, Van Haywood B, Caplan DJ, Tart ND. Nightguard vital bleaching of tetracycline-stained teeth: 90 months post treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(3):142-53.

17.    Jaha HS, Alhejoury HA, Fayad AA, Alnafisah AM, Bahshan IA, Assiri SI, et al. Knowledge, Practices, and Perceptions about Tooth Whitening among Female Population in Saudi Arabia - A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 1):S817-20.

18.    Carey CM. Tooth whitening: what we now know. J Evid-Based Dent Pract. 2014;14 Suppl:70-6.

19.    Bizhang M, Domin J, Danesh G, Zimmer S. Effectiveness of a new non-hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent after single use - a double-blind placebo-controlled short-term study. J Appl Oral Sci Rev FOB. 2017;25(5):575-84.

20.    Goldberg M, Grootveld M, Lynch E. Undesirable and adverse effects of tooth-whitening products: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(1):1-10.


Issue 3 Volume 12 - 2024