%0 Journal Article
%T Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Different Bulk-Fill Composites According to Clinical Evaluation Criteria
%A Özlem Akyüz Begeç
%A Emrullah Bahşi
%J Annals of Dental Specialty
%@ 2347-2022
%D 2021
%V 9
%N 1
%R 10.51847/jRo0pUvJrR
%P 53-61
%X This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of three bulk-fill composites with a conventional composite of microhybride according to two different clinical evaluation criteria. 120 restorations were performed. A doctor restored the randomly selected 30 teeth with the selected 4 materials (GC Posterior-Group 1, Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk Fill-Group 2, Sonic Fill System-Group 3, and Filtek Bulk Fill-Group 4). Patients were called to the clinic for 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Using FDI and USPHS clinical evaluation criteria, Two physicians scored each restoration. For each criterion, intra-group and inter-group data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22 packet program. After one year of evaluation, Surface polish, color stability, and surface structure of Sonic Fill System and Filtek Bulk Fill composites were found when compared with baseline scores (p 
%U https://annalsofdentalspecialty.net.in/article/evaluation-of-the-clinical-performance-of-different-bulk-fill-composites-according-to-clinical-evalu-nyfeutbpnmd1gzp